Skip to content

Reading and Writing: Craft and Structure, 3 original questions

SAT Cross-Text Connections Practice: Questions and Answers

Practice SAT passage-pair questions with three original examples. Compare each author’s claim, identify agreement and explain every answer choice.

On this page

The short answer

For cross-text connections, first summarize each text’s position on the same issue. Then identify the relationship the question asks about: agreement, disagreement, qualification or response. A shared topic does not mean the authors share a conclusion. Keep each claim attached to its author, and choose an answer that accurately represents both texts without adding a stronger claim. These original passage pairs let you practice that comparison before reading the explanations. The useful check is whether you can point to a sentence in each text that supports your choice.

Method at a glance

  1. 1State each position
  2. 2Name the relationship
  3. 3Match both texts
  4. 4Keep the scope

Try the 3 questionsRead the full method

Step-by-step method

Use these steps in order, then apply them to the questions below.

  1. Step 1: State each position

    Write a short claim for Text 1 and a separate claim for Text 2. Include a condition or limitation when the author gives one.

  2. Step 2: Name the relationship

    Read whether the question asks what both authors agree on, how one would respond, or what distinguishes their approaches. These are different tasks.

  3. Step 3: Match both texts

    Check each part of an answer against the correct text. Reject an option that is accurate about one author but misstates the other.

  4. Step 4: Keep the scope

    Watch for words such as always, only and entirely. A limited qualification is not a complete rejection of the other text.

Try 3 SAT-style questions

These are original SAT-style questions written by PeakSAT, not official College Board questions. Choose an answer and check it to see why each choice is right or wrong, or open the worked answer.

No sign-in needed. Your answers stay on this page and are not stored.

Question 1 of 3

Original passage pair

Text 1: Digitizing local archives can make research easier. Instead of examining every folder, a reader can search for a name or phrase and find relevant documents quickly.

Text 2: Searchable archives can save readers time, but only if the scans have accurate text recognition and useful descriptions. A poorly labeled scan may be as difficult to locate as a paper document.

Which statement would both authors most likely agree with?

Choose an answer for question 1
View worked answer for question 1

Correct answer

Choice B: Searching a digital archive can make locating relevant documents more efficient.

Explanation

Both authors allow that searching a digital archive can save effort. Text 1 describes quickly finding documents; Text 2 explicitly says searchable archives can save time, then gives conditions. The word can preserves that shared, limited claim. Text 2 does not reject digitization, and neither author argues that all paper archives should disappear.

Why each choice is right or wrong

  1. Choice A

    Text 2 says a poorly labeled scan may be just as difficult to locate; every scanned document is too absolute.

  2. Choice B

    Correct answer

    This is the shared claim: Text 1 describes faster searching and Text 2 accepts possible time savings.

  3. Choice C

    Text 2 identifies accurate text recognition as a condition, so this reverses its argument.

  4. Choice D

    Neither text recommends eliminating paper archives; this adds a policy the authors do not state.

Question 2 of 3

Original passage pair

Text 1: In this fictional scenario, a park manager credits newly installed benches with increasing weekday visits. The benches, the manager argues, give visitors a comfortable reason to stay.

Text 2: In a separate comparison of two fictional parks, the park with more shaded paths attracted more weekday visitors, even though it had fewer benches. The comparison suggests that shade deserves attention when explaining visitor numbers.

How would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to the explanation in Text 1?

Choose an answer for question 2
View worked answer for question 2

Correct answer

Choice C: Other features, such as shade, may also help explain how many people visit.

Explanation

Text 2 introduces shade as a factor worth considering. That finding would qualify an explanation focused on benches by raising another possible influence on visits. It does not establish that benches have no effect, that the manager measured the wrong days, or that preferences were identical. The cautious may matches the scope of the evidence.

Why each choice is right or wrong

  1. Choice A

    A park with fewer benches attracting more visitors does not prove benches never matter.

  2. Choice B

    Both texts discuss weekday visits; no mistaken weekend measurement is reported.

  3. Choice C

    Correct answer

    This accurately brings Text 2’s proposed shade factor into the explanation of visits.

  4. Choice D

    The texts provide no measurement of identical visitor preferences; the comparison does not prove this.

Question 3 of 3

Original passage pair

Text 1: In this fictional example, painter Leda sketches the arrangement of a painting before applying color. She revises the sketch until the placement of the major shapes is settled.

Text 2: In this fictional example, painter Arun begins with patches of color and lets their relationships guide the placement of shapes. He does not decide the complete arrangement beforehand.

What is the clearest difference between the approaches described?

Choose an answer for question 3
View worked answer for question 3

Correct answer

Choice A: Leda plans major shapes before coloring, whereas Arun develops their arrangement while working with color.

Explanation

Text 1 places arrangement decisions in a preliminary sketch before color is applied. Text 2 places those decisions during the use of color. The contrast concerns when and how the composition develops. Neither text identifies the subject matter, counts colors or describes what happens after a painting is finished.

Why each choice is right or wrong

  1. Choice A

    Correct answer

    This captures the stated contrast in the timing of arrangement decisions.

  2. Choice B

    No realistic-versus-abstract distinction appears in either text.

  3. Choice C

    Text 1 explicitly mentions revising a sketch, while neither text describes revision after completion.

  4. Choice D

    Neither passage gives the number of colors used.

Common mistakes

  • Treating the shared subject as proof of agreement: compare conclusions, not just repeated nouns.

  • Swapping the authors’ claims: mark which text supplies each part of your answer.

  • Turning a qualification into a rejection: preserve conditions and degrees of certainty.

Keep practicing

Everything on this page is free to use. Practicing this skill in the PeakSAT app requires a subscription; one SAT-style assessment is free.

Subscription

Cross-Text Connections practice in PeakSAT

Sign in to keep practicing this skill with more SAT-style questions and explanations in the PeakSAT app.

Full access requires a subscription.

Continue Cross-Text Connections practiceSee pricing

Free

Take one free SAT-style assessment

See your estimated score and missed questions by skill. Google sign-in, no card required.

Take a free assessment

Common questions

How do I compare two texts without rereading everything?

Give each text a short claim first. Return to the specific sentence that confirms the relationship asked for rather than repeatedly reading the whole pair.

Does disagreement mean the second author rejects the entire first text?

No. One author may accept a general idea while limiting its conditions or challenging one explanation. Choose wording that captures the actual degree of disagreement.

What makes an answer about both texts fail?

An answer can correctly describe one text and still fail by misrepresenting the other. Verify each clause against the author it describes.

Sources

  1. College Board: The Reading and Writing Sectionsatsuite.collegeboard.org

Sources are linked for reference; they do not endorse PeakSAT. How we prepare our guides